We have to figure out what the water hardness in mg/L or ppm is for a 20 ml solution of 0.400 M CaClX2.
We learned that the formula for hardness is mg/L of calcium carbonate per liter. I started by calculating that there would be 0.801 g of CaCOX3 precipitate if reacted with NaX2COX3. I then converted 0.801 g to mg and got 801 mg. I finally divides this by the original 20 ml or 0.02 L but this gives 40050 mg/L but the correct answer is 400 mg/L.
I feel like I might be making a mistake with units as my answer is 100 times greater than the correct answer but I don't see the problem.
Answer
Unless I'm missing something, I don't see the problem with your working either. Perhaps check whether you got the original concentration of CaClX2 given in the problem right (the volume of the solution does not affect your final answer). The given answer may well be wrong, it's irritating but it does happen.
There is one thing I want to comment on though: never round off your answer too early. Since you obtained the intermediate answer of 801 mg, I am assuming you used a precise molar mass for CaCOX3 - I will take this to be 100.09 g mol−1. (If you used the value 100 you would have obtained 800 mg.) Your calculations should be:
- Number of moles of CaCOX3 formed upon addition of excess COX3X2−
ηCaCOX3=(0.400 mol dm−3)(0.02 dm3)=0.008 mol
- Mass of said CaCOX3
mCaCOX3=(0.008 mol)(100.09 g mol−1)=0.80072 g=800.72 mg
- Hardness of water in mg L−1
[CaCOX3]=800.72 mg0.02 L=40036 mg L−1
This is your final answer and if you want to round to the appropriate number of significant figures, you should do so only at this point. Your problem is that you rounded too early (after step 2) and this means you obtained an imprecise final answer, 40050 mg L−1.
Here, the appropriate number of sf is technically 3, since the original concentration of CaClX2 is given to you in 3 sf. Since you obtained the imprecise answer 40050 mg L−1, you would have rounded this to 40100. But if you stuck to the precise value at step 2 and obtained the answer 40036 mg L−1, you would round this to 40000.
No comments:
Post a Comment