Saturday, April 14, 2018

equilibrium - Gibbs free energy-minimum or zero?



A reaction proceeds towards the direction of lesser Gibbs free energy (at constant T (temperature) and P (pressure)). So, we could say that Gibbs free energy at equilibrium is minimum.


On the other hand, we have ΔG=ΔG+RTlnQ

, where Q is the reaction quotient. At equilibrium, Q=Keq, and we already know that ΔG=RTlnKeq.


Substituting, we get ΔG=0 at equilibrium. But, we know that G minimized itself—thus there was a change in G and ΔG<0.


What am I missing here?



Answer



I think your question really arises from some confusion about what ΔG represents. In general, ΔX for a thermodynamic quantity X is the change of X along some process. You could make it clear by actually writing ΔG(AB) where A and B are before and after states. (We'll note that, in the general case, ΔX depends on the path take from A to B, making this notation improper. If X is a function of state, though, you're good to go.)


However, in the equation you quote:


ΔG=ΔG0+RTlnQ


the ΔG is a free energy of reaction and should thus be denoted ΔrG, with the correct equation being:


ΔrG=ΔrG0+RTlnQ



The free energy of reaction is defined as ΔrG=GproductsGreactants.




Thus, this ΔrG is not the variation of G over the entire reaction, which would be the ΔG of the system between the start of the reaction and the equilibrium.




PS: I think this link is the online resource I found with the clearer use and explanation of notations. Notations are important in thermodynamics!


No comments:

Post a Comment

digital communications - Understanding the Matched Filter

I have a question about matched filtering. Does the matched filter maximise the SNR at the moment of decision only? As far as I understand, ...