Elsewhere on this site, avi cited sources to the effect that, contrary to the Bavli (M'gila), the events recounted in the book of Ester took place after the second bes hamikdash was built. Do any rishonim (or earlier Judaism sources) say as much, thus lending credibility to the claim? (A number of rishonim, in their commentaries on Nach, did not hesitate to argue with the Bavli's reading of Nach.) I seek not sources who merely could be interpreted as implying as much (after all, one could say the p'sukim themselves imply as much), but sources who actually say so.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
digital communications - Understanding the Matched Filter
I have a question about matched filtering. Does the matched filter maximise the SNR at the moment of decision only? As far as I understand, ...
-
Moderator's note: As with all discussions of Jewish law on this site, any information included in this question or its answers is presen...
-
わりィ のはその関口って奴じゃねぇか。 I'm guessing that this って is という rather than は. So I get something like It's that idiot Sekiguchi isn't it? ...
-
Are there any statistics as to what percentage of Chabad still believes that their Rebbe is the Messiah? Is it the majority or simply a very...
No comments:
Post a Comment