Consider the following reaction at equilibrium. A⟶B,ΔH<0
Suppose I increase the temperature. Now, quite a few people would invoke Le Châtelier's Principle and say that since "heat" is a product of this reaction, the equilibrium should shift backwards. This is clearly wrong because "heat" is not a species you can have in a reaction. You can't incorporate it into the reaction quotient.
If you take ΔG=ΔH−TΔS
Is there an actual theoretical basis for the following claim that does not invoke a principle that does not apply:
For an exothermic reaction at equilibrium, increasing the temperature will cause the equilibrium to shift towards reactants.
Answer
Before to show you that what you said is false (I'm sorry ^^) be sure you understand the constant of a reaction depends on the temperature.
Let the same reaction you want A⇌B
With a constant K∘. Imagine you heat your system a little with dT>0, then by Van't Hoff's law we get:
dln(K∘)dT=ΔrH∘RT2
So if you have an endothermic reaction ΔrH∘>0 because dT>0 then, dln(K∘)>0
Then K∘ will increase with the temperature. If you take dT<0 for an endothermic reaction then the constant of the reaction will decrease with the temperature.
I let you do the same final reasoning for an exothermic reaction. So the "Le Châtelier principle" is still true.
Note: If you know the chemical affinity, you can do the same proof, just a bit longer!
No comments:
Post a Comment