Monday, February 26, 2018

thermodynamics - Le Châtelier's Principle and heat


Consider the following reaction at equilibrium. AB,ΔH<0


Suppose I increase the temperature. Now, quite a few people would invoke Le Châtelier's Principle and say that since "heat" is a product of this reaction, the equilibrium should shift backwards. This is clearly wrong because "heat" is not a species you can have in a reaction. You can't incorporate it into the reaction quotient.


If you take ΔG=ΔHTΔS

for ΔS<0, you could make a claim of the equilibrium shifting backwards at higher T. This doesn't have anything to do with the sign of ΔH however.


Is there an actual theoretical basis for the following claim that does not invoke a principle that does not apply:




For an exothermic reaction at equilibrium, increasing the temperature will cause the equilibrium to shift towards reactants.




Answer



Before to show you that what you said is false (I'm sorry ^^) be sure you understand the constant of a reaction depends on the temperature.




Let the same reaction you want AB


With a constant K. Imagine you heat your system a little with dT>0, then by Van't Hoff's law we get:


dln(K)dT=ΔrHRT2

Where R is the perfect gas constant which is positive. Then RT2>0. So dln(K) as the same sign as ΔrHdT.


So if you have an endothermic reaction ΔrH>0 because dT>0 then, dln(K)>0



Then K will increase with the temperature. If you take dT<0 for an endothermic reaction then the constant of the reaction will decrease with the temperature.


I let you do the same final reasoning for an exothermic reaction. So the "Le Châtelier principle" is still true.


Note: If you know the chemical affinity, you can do the same proof, just a bit longer!


No comments:

Post a Comment

digital communications - Understanding the Matched Filter

I have a question about matched filtering. Does the matched filter maximise the SNR at the moment of decision only? As far as I understand, ...