Wednesday, June 26, 2019

stability - Why is tin-112 stable, but indium-112 radioactive?


According to Wikipedia, tin-112 is a stable nuclide, but indium-112 is radioactive (half-life only 14 minutes). What is the explanation for this?



Answer



For isobars (i.e. nuclides with a constant mass number A), the binding energy E as a function of the atomic number Z describes a parabola, the so-called valley of β-stability (see also Weizsäcker’s formula or semi-empirical mass formula).


E=aZ2+bZ+c±d/A3/4


The most stable nuclides lie at the bottom of the valley (but not necessarily exactly at the minimum of the parabola). Isobars with lower atomic numbers Z are unstable to β decay. Isobars with higher atomic numbers Z are unstable to β+ decay or electron capture. Therefore, at least one of two adjacent isobars must be radioactive (see Mattauch isobar rule).



Thus, since Sn-112 is stable, we expect In-112 to be radioactive.


The last term (±d/A3/4) gives rise to three different parabola depending on whether the nuclides are even-A (with even Z and even N), even-A (with odd Z and odd N), or odd-A (with even Z and odd N, or with odd Z and even N).
In the last case, in which the mass number A is odd, the result is a single parabola with one stable nuclide at the bottom.
However, for even mass numbers A, we find two parabolas; the odd-odd-curve always lies above the even-even curve. Hence, it is possible that two or even three stable isobars exist.


The case with two parabolas also applies to your example. The stable nuclide Sn-112 has 50 protons and 62 neutrons (even-even). The radioactive nuclide In-112 has 49 protons and 63 neutrons (odd-odd). The next neighbour, Cd-112 has 48 protons and 64 neutrons (even-even) and is stable.


No comments:

Post a Comment

digital communications - Understanding the Matched Filter

I have a question about matched filtering. Does the matched filter maximise the SNR at the moment of decision only? As far as I understand, ...